Great Civilization or Great Destroyer of Cultures?

topic posted Tue, January 13, 2004 - 4:07 PM by  SprocketRun
Having grown up overseas, I have many memories of the fantastic achievements yet visible of Roman architecture and have a fair basic knowledge of some of their social structure & history. In reseaching some basics of their conquest on Gaul and Britain, I have started to form a much different picture.

It's fascinating to dwell upon the similarities between ancient Rome and the United States in both symbolism and actions. For certain, many key differences exist.
I have found a real kinship with those of Native American origins and my own forefathers of Friesland. The horrors inflicted upon the American Indian over the past 500 years by europeans mirror what was done to the Northern Europeans by the Romans and their political heirs under the guise of theology.
Any culture that slaughters women and children with "advanced" military precision needs to look deep in the mirror and reconcile it's collective conscience before delaring itself great. (yeah, yeah .. the victors get to write the history, etc.)

Just here to cause trouble with a dignified smirk of respect to all.
  • The Romans destroyed a lot but I thought the present day Low Countries was not one of the places known for that. And as far as the Germanic peoples in general, in spite of the short-lived attempt to conquer them, overall it seems to me they were allies of the Romans who also gained at the expense of the Celts.
  • Not a good analogy. Most people in the US and in the Netherlands are not aware of the fact that form most of its history the Roman Empire was a Christian state centered in Constantinople, from 330 AD to 1453.

    Most people tend to think of the Roman Empire as the city of Rome, when in fact the empire of the ROMANS was centered in New Rome Constantinople for most of its history, with the city of Rome having declined to insignificant provincial status long before Emperor Constantine moved the capital to the more important, richer, more civilized, more ancient, more educated East.

    Following successive barbarian invasions from the North (the teutonic, blue-eyed, blont types), the Western part of the Empire was abandoned by the authorities in Constantinople as impossible to defend, and reverted to multitudes of feudal kingdoms, whose Germanofrankish autocrats turned the Romans into serfs and villains, keeping them under control from 40,000 fortified castles (castillos, chateaux).

    The consequent onset of the DARK AGES meant the reversion of these areas into barbarism, ignorance and warlordism.

    For example, England (the former Anglia province of the empire), where magnificent Roman edifices and other manifistations of Roman culture still amaze visitors, became so devoid of culture, that not one single piece of writing, not one articact, not the slightest indication of civilization has been found from the period of FIVE CENTURIES that followed the withdrawl of the Romans.
    • Unsu...
       
      You grossly undervalue the Roman Republic period and the early imperial period; ie the Pax Romana. You also seem to imply that Virgil, Caesar, Cicero, Ovid, Augustus, et al were mere minor players, when in fact - Rome was (and is) because of them. I'm a student of Byzantium but to weigh it over the early period I believe is an injustice.

      To the Post - they were both; but don't fall into the error of blaming Rome for what was and is a human quality. Ever one did it, and still doing it; eg, Sudan, Iraq, France (on it's southern peoples), Dixie on the Blacks, etc.

Recent topics in "Roman History"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
The Cave of Romulus and Remus: Lupercale discovered Lazarus 0 November 20, 2007
Opinions of Cicero offlineCV 0 October 21, 2007
History of Rome Achbar 0 May 8, 2007
A Dream of Eagles Unsubscribed 2 March 28, 2005